 |
February 20, 2006 Eastern Neighborhood Rezoning Represents Opportunities and Obstacles
By Alison Fromme
Special to the Neighborhood Newswire
San Francisco is growing, but its land area, obviously, is not. As
a result, there’s increasing pressure to make the best use of
available space. The challenge is, what constitutes “best”
depends on who you are, where you live, and what economic interest you
represent.
The Bayview-Hunters Point, Mission, Potrero, and South-of-Market communities
are “ground zero” for efforts to determine how best to direct
new development. Since 1998, neighborhood activists, City planners,
developers, and others have been hammering out a master vision for future
development-- known as the Eastern
Neighborhoods Plan.
The Plan is supposed to provide a systematic guide for development;
a way of dissuading piecemeal projects that don’t meet the neighborhoods’
needs. However, over the past seven years, while various stakeholders
grappled with how best to accommodate growth, a significant number of
development projects have been approved – more than 1,000 rental
or condominium units are currently being constructed on or adjacent
to Potrero Hill alone.
“Basic land use decisions have to be made, and this issue is
becoming more and more urgent,” said Amit Ghosh, San Francisco’s
Chief of Comprehensive Planning. “Right now, everything is uncertain
and that’s not a good way to be.”
Optimists, such as Potrero Hill resident David Kerr, believe that new
development will bring improved infrastructure, expanded open space,
job growth, affordable housing, and other valuable enhancements. “I'm
very excited about more residential development in and near Potrero
Hill because I believe density creates more opportunity for transit
and nice quality of life,” Kerr said. “I've been opposed
to those who really want to limit new development. I don't think underused
or empty warehouses contribute more than new housing and businesses
will. And I think more people living here will add vitality to the existing
businesses and street culture.”
But there are obstacles to achieving Kerr’s vision. “We're
known throughout the world for our diverse neighborhoods, mixture of
demographics and incomes, neighborhood owned stores, views and vistas.
All that is set to be lost without guidance from the Planning Department.
Not only don't I see that guidance, I see instead a land grab that includes
densities and heights that conflict with common sense urban planning
concepts,” said Potrero Hill resident Kepa Askenasy.
The Eastern
Neighborhood Plan represents a giant step forward, according to
Joe Boss, the Potrero Hill Boosters Neighborhood Association’s
recording secretary. “Over the past eight years there has been
a lot of development in the industrially zoned land, with no effective
way of ending up with a complete neighborhood. Without planning and
the identification of the impacts and fees to pay for those impacts,
we will end up with a lot of new residents that have no normal services
nearby, who ultimately drive to get to those services,” he said.
As part of the Plan, the Planning Department has proposed zoning changes
that would allow residential buildings on land that is currently designated
as “light industry”, a catchall category that includes caterers,
animal boarding facilities, taxi services, furniture production, clothing
manufacturing, and even “big box” retailers. Under one option,
industrial land along Mariposa between De Haro and Arkansas would become
residential mixed with light industrial or commercial, as would the
blocks bounded by Vermont Street, Division Street, De Haro and 16th,
and the area west of Pennsylvania Avenue between 22nd and 23rd.
Market demand for light industrial land is expected to continue to
decline over the next 25 years, mostly due to the high cost of doing
business in San Francisco. As a result, even with the proposed changes,
the remaining land zoned for light industry should be adequate through
2030, according to a study by Berkeley-based Economic and Planning Systems
commissioned by the Planning Department.
Approximately 20,000 light industry jobs are currently on land that
under the Plan could be zoned for other purposes, mainly residential.
More than two-thirds of those jobs, particularly associated with publishing,
audio-visual, and design, are expected to be displaced over the next
quarter century regardless of changes in land use policies due to market
forces. The City would have to take affirmative action, as it’s
done to recruit biotechnology to the eastern neighborhoods, to retain
this employment base, which so far it has declined to do.
The Planning Department’s rezoning proposals are limited to
addressing the balance of land for commercial and housing uses, according
to the Department of Public Health Eastern Neighborhoods Community Health
Assessment, a project that aims to predict the effects of rezoning on
community health. The proposal excludes visionary planning for public
spaces, schools, transit, and community services.
This concerns Potrero Hill resident Marty Wall, despite his excitement
about neighborhood development. “Lack of funding and after-school
programs are a big problem. When kids get off school and there are not
very many parks or activities for them to take advantage of, it can
cause them to be restless,” he said.
Residents are also concerned about a host of other land use challenges,
including a lack of affordable housing, and displacement of existing
residents and businesses. But according to the Plan, “many of
these concerns do not address changes in the physical environment…
and therefore are properly addressed in another context.”
The Eastern Neighborhoods Plan won’t move forward until its environmental
impact – including potential effects on visual quality, transportation,
noise, air quality, and contamination from former industrial sites --
is assessed sometime later this year. In the meantime, interim zoning
controls -- measures to prevent any zoning changes until the Plan has
been adopted -- have already expired. New controls will be considered
by the Planning Commission later this month, but even these short-term
measures are controversial, with the Potrero Hill Boosters Neighborhood
Association calling them “dangerously vague and ill-considered.”
One way or another, City planners and community activist hope to finally
get ahead of the development deluge before the end of this year. “The
world changes by the time we’re ready to approve changes,”
the Planning Department’s Ghosh said. Potrero Hill residents are
hoping that these changes will be for the better.
For more information, visit the San Francisco Planning Department’s
website: http://www.sfgov.org/site/planning_index.asp
The Eastern Neighborhoods Initial Study can be found at http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/planning/EasternNeighborhoodsIS.pdf
This is the second of a series of three articles focusing on land
use changes in San Francisco’s eastern neighborhoods.
|